I would not go with the basic STR, DEX, CON, INT, etc. It's science fiction and not ultra-realistic.Īs to the concept of attributes! It has a lot of potential especially if you factor in skill points. Yes, I am aware of that, but this is a game in a space opera universe. Just like SVs and CVs do space battles we would have safer tools to do tight quarters combat. The point is we would not be doing combat at the point of Empyrion, even modern subs are currently equipped with drones. I've worked on the Globalhawk and the Predator drone. I work in Aviation on drones as a civilian. Drones are advancing faster than tanks did in WW2 and they are almost to the point where they cost less than the training and life of a soldier. I know several work shops and brain trusts working on military programs to remove soldiers from combat. That is something I think would be great to have in the game and I think I brought it up in a previous post. These items are exactly the suggestions I posted in my first response.
Kotor taris foot locker password portable#
Halo has drop shield and portable barriers. I agree with this and believe that the hitboxes still need to be refined for headshots and bodyshots.Ī head shot should kill everything in 1 or 2 shots regardless of the difficulty. Not sure what this means, I never questioned this. If you are not wearing a helmet and your shot in the face with a "Sniper Rifle" it should be death. That sure was difficult to read, but I think I understand your point. With the exception of when Shepard got stuck to cover on the wrong side of combat, the AI, cover and enemy interaction was excellent, however the bionics barriers and helmet-less head protection was broken. Debating a point should include ideas/suggestions/answers to problems, not just saying it won't work. We need to take risks and add new content!"Īgain, what are you proposing that we add. Perfect example of vague, "We shouldn't add that bc another game has that. I am all for picking the best parts of other games, but that does not mean we should pursue the weaker parts of those game. Sometimes it seems you talk yourself in circles. I'm reading your posts and it seems to be unorganized and I can't seem to find out what you are promoting. This is why I believe this idea deserves attention. This is superior than what you suggested because of this reason. If you can highlight your ideas and set them apart with a different color. That isn't brainstorming or constructive. Please give me a detailed explanation on why this is a "stereotypical application" and propose a fix to this problem instead of saying it won't work. I like the pretext but I am not a fan of the stereotypical application. Just because I purpose looking at it from a different angle in regards to the OP does not mean that the idea is not functional. Challenging a concept is not that same as disregarding it.
0 kommentar(er)
